Spm versioning - #67

Looks good. I will have to check to see what version we are using.

Cool. I know @rcwelsh is still planning to do some work to ensure that
toolboxes are in good shape.

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:05 AM, heffjos <
reply@reply.github.com

wrote:

Looks good. I will have to check to see what version we are using.

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

#67 (comment)

Daniel A. Kessler
Research Area Computer Specialist
Psychiatry - Rachel Upjohn Building
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
kesslerd@umich.edu
+1 734.418.8134

Yup, on my for this afternoon.

R

typos due to iPhone 4S

On Jun 21, 2012, at 10:10, "Daniel A Kessler" reply@reply.github.com wrote:

Cool. I know @rcwelsh is still planning to do some work to ensure that
toolboxes are in good shape.

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:05 AM, heffjos <
reply@reply.github.com

wrote:

Looks good. I will have to check to see what version we are using.

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

#67 (comment)

Daniel A. Kessler
Research Area Computer Specialist
Psychiatry - Rachel Upjohn Building
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
kesslerd@umich.edu
+1 734.418.8134

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#67 (comment)

---

Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues

Okay, sorry for the delay, this is what is missing and I need to reconcile getting working copies into each

   Legacy                     R4290                       R4667
   ----------------           ----------------            -------------------
    ExtractVals                                            ExtractVals
    Shoot (probably won't add)
    SimpleROIBuilder
                              vbm8   
                              wfu_pickatlas                wfu_pickatlas

Also they all seem to not have "aal"

@rcwelsh let me know if you add some commits on top of what you've fetched from me, and if so, into which branch you put them. I'll snag them and add to this pull request.

working on it now.

On 6/27/12 2:31 PM, "Daniel A Kessler"
<reply+i-5171155-adba03f4f5ed929ca80c5d2144cb2cf280c6943a-1485912@reply.git
hub.com> wrote:

@rcwelsh let me know if you add some commits on top of what you've fetched
from me, and if so, into which branch you put them. I'll snag them and add
to this pull request.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#67 (comment)
645

Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues

Hey @rcwelsh, any progress?

ug, yes, but not i can't remember the push command

i've got it local as "SPM_versioning"

I'm heading downtown to look at monuments (we are in DC this week), but I'll push once I'm back after lunch.

:-D

git push rcwelsh SPM_versioning

should do it (assuming you have your github remote set up as rcwelsh).

I'll push tomorrow night, I'm without Internet on my laptop till then.

R

typos due to iPhone 4S

On Jul 6, 2012, at 15:58, "Mike Angstadt" reply@reply.github.com wrote:

git push rcwelsh SPM_versioning

should do it (assuming you have your github remote set up as rcwelsh).

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#67 (comment)

---

Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues

so i pushed up from my local to my verse with "git push robert_verse SPM_versioning", but now when I'm on github and go to my verse and get to the SPM_versioning france and hit "pull request" i'm getting a github error. :-(

I'll be on the road for the next 10 hours.

-R

Hmm, not sure what might be going wrong. I just tried to submit a dummy pull request just to make sure it wasn't a Github problem, and it worked. Not sure if @dankessler has an idea (he's on vacation I believe through Wednesday) or maybe email Github support?

just want to make sure i'm going it correctly. the email i sent outside of git, that procedure is correct? could it be some weirdo thing that dan also has a pull request named the same?

just sent help request to github

Your steps looked fine.

So it's failing right when you hit the pull request button? Because the way it should work is that pressing pull request should direct you to a page that you can enter the title and description of the pull request before actually submitting it. If it didn't even get to that point it sounds like a github issue, although I suppose it's possible it's somehow failing due to the existing pull requests, but if you didn't even get to title it yet it shouldn't be a name conflict.

Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues

yeah, I get it right after hitting the "pull request". hopefully this is
not an issue of the pull request being too big? we'll just have to wait to
see what github says.

-r

On 7/9/12 10:13 AM, "Mike Angstadt"
<reply+i-5171155-adba03f4f5ed929ca80c5d2144cb2cf280c6943a-1485912@reply.git
hub.com> wrote:

Your steps looked fine.

So it's failing right when you hit the pull request button? Because the
way it should work is that pressing pull request should direct you to a
page that you can enter the title and description of the pull request
before actually submitting it. If it didn't even get to that point it
sounds like a github issue, although I suppose it's possible it's somehow
failing due to the existing pull requests, but if you didn't even get to
title it yet it shouldn't be a name conflict.

Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not
be used for urgent or sensitive issues

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#67 (comment)
502

Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues

Additional commits by @rcwelsh are now in pull request #76, so I'm closing this issue so discussion can continue there.